2025 PADFlashr vs Foxflash vs Other Tools

By | February 14, 2025

What’s new in 2025 PADFlashr programmer? What’s the difference between PADFlash, Foxflash and other tools?

Here is a table comparison:

Feature PADFLASHR

PADFLASHR 2025

FOXFLASH

Foxflash

Other Tools (FLEX, KESS, etc.)
Protocol Coverage Supports EMS2.4, SID6, SID8, MD1CS018, MG1CA811 Does not support EMS2.4, SID6, SID8, MD1CS018, MG1CA811 Varies by tool
TCU Support Less Strong Varies by tool
Bench Support Yes Yes Some yes, some no
Supported Vehicles Car, Truck, Tractor, Marine, Bike Car, Truck, Tractor, Marine, Bike Typically limited (e.g., Car or Truck or Bike)
Subscription Fee No No Some no, some ~$600/year
Read Methods Bench, OBD, Full System, Boot, JTAG, BDM Bench, OBD, Full System, Boot, JTAG, BDM Varies by tool
Virtual Read Yes, more VR files Yes Some yes, some no
Internet Connection Yes Yes Yes
Dongle Yes No Part of them have
EMS2.4 Yes No Varies by tool
SID6 & SID8 Support Yes No Some yes, some no
PSG16 Clone Bench Read, Can be cloned OBD Read, Cannot be cloned OBD or Boot
M10JA Support Bench Read, Can be cloned OBD, Boot, OTB, Cannot be cloned Some OBD, some Bench, some Boot
MD1CS018 Yes No Some can, some cannot
MG1CA811 Yes No Some can, some cannot
Master or Slave Master Master Master or Slave
Language Support 16 Less than 16 About 6
Counter Reset Yes No Varies by tool
Speed Modification Partly supported No Varies by tool
Conclusion Better for cloning without opening ECU Strong TCU support Varies by tool

They are different tools. PADFlash has less TCU coverage, foxflash has less ECU.  Padflash has VR support, some of the data foxflash can’t supply.